Direct expropriation involves formal seizure of assets by the host state. Indirect or creeping expropriation occurs when a series of regulatory measures, taken together, substantially deprive an investor of their investment's value without formal title transfer.
Political risk experts analyse the sequence of government actions, their cumulative effect on investment value, and whether measures go beyond legitimate regulation. The Chorzow Factory standard requires fair market value compensation for expropriated investments.
ICSID jurisprudence and the Hull Formula inform valuation and liability analysis. UK investor-state cases including Woodhouse/West Cumbria Mining demonstrate the growing relevance of expropriation analysis in domestic treaty disputes.
Related Practice Area
Related Services
Frequently Asked Questions
What is indirect expropriation and how is it proved?
Indirect (or creeping) expropriation occurs when a series of regulatory measures, taken together, substantially deprive an investor of their investment's value without formal title transfer. Political risk experts analyse the sequence of government actions, their cumulative effect on investment value, and whether the measures go beyond legitimate regulation.
How is expropriated investment valued?
Under the Chorzow Factory standard, expropriated investment is valued at fair market value, what the investment would be worth in an open market transaction absent the expropriation. Political risk and forensic accounting experts typically work together on this analysis.